I think we can all agree that, when it comes to doing your prep work, there are numerous benefits to participating in a variety of mock drafts. You learn the player pool more thoroughly, who the sneaky sleeper picks still are, which players are consistently rising and which are falling, and what kind of team you can build from whatever position you draw on draft day. But obviously not every mock allows you to learn all of that each time.
Sometimes you don’t have enough participants so you have to endure computer players and sometimes you get people who are only interested in mocking the first 10 rounds and go to auto-pick for the duration of the draft. In both cases, your draft becomes a slave of the site’s default rankings and it’s pretty safe to assume that not everyone thinks so highly of every site’s default rankings. Sometimes, like so many trolls on these wacky interwebz, you even get people who, for whatever inane reason they may have, select certain players just to disrupt the general flow. It makes no sense to me either, but it happens nonetheless. Those mocks end up being an exercise of futility as you never end up learning what you were hoping to learn when you started.
What has been put together is a series of mock drafts that will run from now through the end of March. Our goal is to bring you the valuable experience of a high quality mock draft made up of a combination of industry experts and dedicated participants who are looking to hone their drafting skills prior to the big day. Each mock draft will have at least half of its participants as experts and the rest of the field filled out by readers, Twitter followers and listeners to the RotoWire show on SiriusXM Fantasy Radio. Mock Draft Army mocks will be announced over the weekend to the experts and after we fill our quota of industry folk, the drafts will be opened to the public. Together, we will help each other understand the different trends that are occurring in drafts this spring and figure out which strategy works best for you in a particular style of league.
Tuesday night was the very first draft done by the Mock Draft Army and according to all of its participants, it was a rousing success. We whipped through a 12-team, 28-round 5x5 mixed league snake-style draft in just under two hours all the while chatting up picks, discussing draft value, highlighting current events and, of course, the general ribbing that tends to ensue when you put a group of baseball nerds together in a competitive situation.
What’s even better is that several of the industry folk will be writing up their draft experiences so that you have a better understanding of their strategy and rationale for each selection. The amount of detail they cover will be entirely up to them, but you, the readers, should be able to take plenty out of each write-up. What I’m going to do here today is compare the ADP from the first Mock Draft Army experience with that of the NFBC as those drafts are coming soon. We’ll focus on the outliers as those picks are usually the ones that require the most explanation and understanding.
I won’t be doing every single player of every round as that would be even more cumbersome than my long-winded introduction here, so what I’ve done is broken the draft down into four four-round breaks – We’ll look at Rounds 1-4, 9-12, 17-20 and 25-28. That should give you a strong enough look, and if you’re feeling cheated, you can, of course, look at the full draft results right here.
You get the first two sections today with the other two coming on Friday…
|Player||Pos||Team||Drafted||NFBC ADP||% Diff|
|Hanley Ramirez||SS, 3B||LAD||23||19.72||-14.26%|
The two biggest reaches in this cross-section came from RotoGraphs’ David Wiers at the wheel after the first round. There is definitely a growing popularity for Paul Goldschmidt who, according to the NFBC data is coming off the board near the tail-end of the third/early fourth round, but Wiers obviously didn’t think he would make it back to him with so many picks in between. The Jay Bruce selection also has me scratching my head as he is typically a mid to late third round pick as well and there was probably a strong chance that he made it back to Wiers at the 36th pick. With the exception of Justin Verlander, there is not a single player in round two that I would have taken Bruce over.
While the top first basemen are a hot commodity at the beginning of most drafts, this crew just went nuts, despite the incredible depth found at the position. Wiers did it again when he took Anthony Rizzo more than 60 picks earlier than where he usually goes in drafts. The pick seemed unusual given the proven talent that was still on the board and the fact that he already had Goldschmidt, but he definitely started a bit of a panic amongst the rest of the draft room. After his selection, three more first basemen came off the board sending Mastersball’s Pasko Varnica into a state of panic which compelled him to grab Adam LaRoche almost 80 picks ahead of his usual ADP.
Yadier Molina continues to climb up ADP trend reports as he is, once again, being taken way above his usual place in drafts. He’s pushing your usual rising backstops down in drafts which is certainly helpful to those of us who like to wait on the position, but for those who are eyeing the Cardinals catcher for this year, you may have to look elsewhere as a third or fourth round selection just seems too high and I don’t recommend it given the depth found at the position this year as well as the greater injury risk that seems to go hand-in-hand with catchers.
Ask anyone who has been doing a whole mess of mock drafts and they’ll tell you that starting pitching is just so incredibly deep this year that you can easily wait on the position. That’s always good for pitching hounds as the opportunity to bulk up on aces grows, but it comes at the expense of some serious hitting potential. But this group was not made up of pitching hounds at all as Stephen Strasburg (-62.32%), Clayton Kershaw (-46.23%) and Justin Verlander (-32.41%) had the three biggest drops in comparison to their NFBC ADP. While I, personally, wouldn’t have made those selections, it’s hard to fault anyone for doing so just based on the value you are probably getting here. Maybe not so much with Verlander at the tail-end of the second round, but Eric, from Fantasy Baseball Submission and our good buddy Mr. Wiers certainly hauled in some nice value with a mid-third for Kershaw and a turn-pick of Strasburg at the fourth, respectively.
A couple of other guys who fell and could prove to ultimately gain value by doing so are Josh Hamilton (-29.15%), Adrian Gonzalez (-25.09%) and Adam Jones (-23.43%). Of course, Hamilton will need to stay healthy and produce like he did in the first half of last year, A-Gone needs to recoup some of that lost power and Jones, well, he just needs to repeat what he did last season. Unfortunately, Jones would have to put up Braun-type numbers to turn the same profit he did last season. Not that he can’t, but it’s pretty doubtful.
|Player||Pos||Team||Drafted||NFBC ADP||% Diff|
So the biggest reach, and a pick that drew tremendous criticism in the chat area, was Munson15’s ninth round selection of Cameron Maybin who was taken more than 100 picks higher than where his NFBC ADP is at. Now personally, and I’ve said this before, I love Maybin. I think his skill set is awesome and I truly believe that, one day, he’s going to put it all together and be exactly who the Marlins thought they were getting when they traded Miguel Cabrera for him years ago. Unfortunately, that belief has been my Achilles heel in fantasy over the past few years and it could be the same for my man, Munson15 if Maybin doesn’t deliver. Granted, the outfield was starting to look pretty thin if you were just looking at the default rankings on Mock Draft Central, but scroll further and further down and I’m sure Munson15 would have realized that it was ok to wait. Still, I don’t hate the pick as much as everyone else did. The only thing is that, in order to turn a profit, he needs to go 15-40 at the minimum and bring that batting average north of .260, at the very least.
Munson15 obviously didn’t do himself any favors when he reached on Alfonso Soriano with an 80-pick reach on what is usually a 213.06 ADP. Again though, he only had Giancarlo Stanton and Maybin rostered and outfielders were flying off the board in between his picks. It’s why we do the mocks, people. Guaranteed, Munson15 learned from the experience and all will be right when he’s sitting there on his actual draft day.
Other significant reaches included Adam Dunn (+53.50%), Neil Walker (+53.52%), Torii Hunter (+47.93%), Kyle Seager (+41.35%), and yes, even I stretched things a little when I took my first closer, Tom Wilhelmsen, a good 37 picks before he usually goes. What can I say? I’m a sucker for quality closers with good job security, it was the 11th round and we were on the cusp of a big closer run as another three came off the board before my next pick.
It’s just not a good time to be a Yankee or a Yankee fan as Curtis Granderson (-63.95%), Mark Teixeira (-34.17%), and CC Sabathia (-31.52%) lead the way for biggest fallers in this part of the draft. Grandy and Tex are obvious, as both are looking at a 10-week absence due to injury and really, with CC’s knees and all that weight he’s carrying, it’s no wonder people aren’t buying this year.
R.A. Dickey (-33.54%) is getting zero respect this year. Zero. When as the last time you saw a guy win the Cy Young award and then fall to the ninth round in your fantasy draft? I’m not buying him either, especially with the hitter’s park at home and the fact that Tim Wakefield helped train most of the AL East hitters for all those years.
More pitchers continued to drop, so there were really no surprises. If there’s no demand for them on the market, then it doesn’t matter what kind of strikeout potential Aroldis Chapman and Chris Sale have. Waiting on pitchers was a strong theme through the entire draft, so seeing most of them fall way beneath their ADP isn’t a shock. In fact, you should track the ADP of pitchers when you are drafting for real because that will tell you if waiting is going to benefit you significantly or if you should act a little sooner than you normally would.
The second half of this will be out on Friday morning and if you’re looking for more write-ups on this draft, definitely check out my blog, RotobuzzGuy.com, as well as anyplace at which some of the other mockers write.
And if you’re looking to join in on the action, follow me on Twitter -- @rotobuzzguy – and look for the #MockDraftArmy over the next couple of days.
By Chiefmac64, 3/6/2013 10:53 PM
Howard - can't wait for next draft on Sat. Bozos in the house!
By Kenn Ruby, 3/7/2013 8:33 AM
I'm team 10 (with Jose Bautista and Bryce Harper as my first two picks), and I didn't realize how much I was reaching all night. It's easy to get distracted during these thigns. I was dealing with a minor flood in my basement, as well as my "payment" for not putting the kids to bed - folding laundry in between picks, but still had a great time. My feeling on mock drafts (and this was my first one this year) is to have a little fun, take some chances, and see where it all ends up. Knowing that we don't have to play out the whole season gives you freedom to go after guys you wouldn't normally choose (I *never* get Bryce Harper guys) and roll the dice late (I picked up Hamilton in the 27th round, even though I already had three shortstops, just because). The only real reach Howard called me out on above was Neil Walker, who I don't particularly like, but I just wanted *something* from the position. I also probably went too heavy on pitchers just because I like having a good pitching staff with sparkling K/BB and WHIPs (and I didn't get the one I really wanted - Estrada). So I have Romo...and Motte...and Betancourt. Overkill, I know, but I love those guys.
Still, it's all fun, and for March 5, it's a great exercise. I'm in spring training too, you know. By the time the regular season starts, I'm going to be sharp.
By JOHND4801, 3/7/2013 3:06 PM
Wow Goldschmidt #12, Bruce #13, Rizzo #36 and LaRoche #48??? Lmao. What exactly gives someone the label of 'expert' these days. What a joke.
By msarvi, 3/7/2013 3:40 PM
Bruce and Goldschmidt before Stanton, Upton & Beltre to name but a few is crazy. They could have better years but why would you reach? If you had a crystal ball in last year's drafts, would you pick Trout, Braun (who had the PED suspension hanging over his head), Dickey or Rodney in the early rounds? Of course not. If you pick a guy in the early rounds that is 2+ rounds earlier than where you can reasonably get him, you are not going to win many leagues. Are you sure the draft wasn't a victim of one of those trolls?
By msarvi, 3/7/2013 3:53 PM
BTW, the earliest (not average) that Bruce has been picked in 92 NFBC drafts is #25, Goldy #28 & Rizzo #60. I will say that Strausburg's latest picked is #28 and Kershaw's #25 so there were "bargains" there.
By Kenn Ruby, 3/8/2013 1:52 PM
While I don't agree that Goldy, Bruce, Rizzo, and LaRoche should've gone that high, there's no reason to really get upset about those choices. I like to think of these mock drafts (especially in early March) as akin to a long-time pitcher working on a new pitch in spring training. Maybe it'll work, and maybe it won't, but the results aren't really important in the grand scheme of things. Maybe the Goldschimdt/Bruce/Rizzo owner was just trying out a new strategy when the stakes weren't high, trying to see what kind of team he could build by taking power hitter/1B types early and picking up pitching later. Picking at the wheel, he knew he wasn't getting Goldschmidt or Bruce in rounds 3-4, so this was his chance. I don't begrudge him.
I might think Marco Estrada will win the Cy Young this year and be better than Verlander (don't worry, I like him, but not THAT much), but I'd be stupid to draft him before Verlander (or Kershaw, or Strasburg, etc.) because that's not where the market says he'll be. But if we're one round before the market says he should be and I know I won't get him before my next pick, why NOT reach, especially if the stakes are low and I'm a little rusty from the offseason?
By msarvi, 3/8/2013 4:25 PM
I'm not upset. I'm say what you are saying in your Estrada/Verlander example. Taking the guys that average 49 & 43 in ADP at 12 & 13 doesn't make sense. There is a chance that you don't get them but not much of one. You'd have to be pretty sure that they were going to produce as #12 & #13 players or you are behind the field. Picking Rizzo at 36 with an ADP of 97 and LaRoche with 48 with a 126 ADP is mocking the mock. If your purpose is to use a strategy of taking those "types" of players in that order to see what you have later on for pitchers or whatever is fine, but be realistic. He could have picked Stanton and E5 and accomplished the same thing without corrupting the draft. The guys picking after him now have choices that aren't as realistic. Goldy could have a MVP year, but you'd have a better chance winning your league if he does that from the third or fourth round than from the first. Whatever. Just an opinion.
By kennruby, 3/9/2013 6:53 AM
No, that's cool. I agree with you. I was just trying to get an idea of why he did what he did. Maybe he'll come here and explain himself. I think in a *real* draft (with or without experts), there are wacky picks that "mock the mock" as you say, so we should be prepared for them as well. I may have reached a bit for Bryce Harper in the second round, but after drafting closely after the Goldschmidt/Bruce wheel, I had a few more options than I expected, and with 59 seconds to make a pick and an embarrassment of riches, I liked the challenge of having to pick one.
By msarvi, 3/9/2013 7:35 AM
Ken, Harper wasn't a reach because you could expect a high probability that he would not get back to you at #34.